|
|
1.2 Loss Mechanisms:
Why High-Frequency Signals Fade
|
|
How much does the signal
attenuate per metre (dB/m)? That number grows non-linearly with frequency, driven by three overlapping loss
mechanisms:
|
|
① Conductor loss α_c Caused by the skin effect. Current flows only on the surface; frequency ↑ → effective
cross-section ↓ → resistance ↑.
|
|
α_c ∝ √f · Rs / (2π · a ·
ln(b/a))(coax, where Rs is surface resistivity)
|
|
② Dielectric loss α_d Dielectric molecules repeatedly polarize in the alternating
field, dissipating heat.
|
|
α_d ∝ f · √εᵣ · tan δ(tan δ = loss tangent, the key material figure of merit)
|
|
③ Proximity effect Current crowding between adjacent conductors raises effective AC resistance. Especially
severe in twisted pairs and dense differential pairs.
|
|
Typical coax total loss vs
frequency
|
Below ~1
GHz conductor loss dominates; above it, dielectric loss takes over. That's
why mmWave cables chase ultra-low-Df materials (foam PE, PTFE).
|
|
1.3 S-Parameters & TDR: The Language
of Measurement
|
|
S-parameters (Scattering
Parameters)describe how a two-port network reflects
and transmits at a given frequency:
|
Parameter
|
Meaning
|
Ideal
|
|
S11
|
Port-1 reflection coefficient (dB)
|
−∞ (lower better)
|
|
S21
|
Port-1 → 2 transmission (dB)
|
0 (lower better)
|
|
S12
|
Port-2 → 1 isolation (dB)
|
−∞ (reverse isolation)
|
|
S22
|
Port-2 reflection coefficient (dB)
|
−∞
|
|
The
frequency where S21 = −3 dB defines the cable's−3
dB bandwidth— the half-power point.
|
|
TDR (Time Domain
Reflectometry): send a fast pulse down the line, look at
the reflection's timing and amplitude — you can locateimpedance discontinuitiesand
tell whether they're open, short, or somewhere in between.
|
|
Positive
reflection = open or high-Z; negative reflection = short or low-Z. Time-axis
× propagation velocity = fault location.
|
|
1.4 Dielectric Materials: Dk and Df Are
What Matter
|
|
Two numbers decide
high-frequency performance: Dk = εᵣ(permittivity, sets impedance and propagation velocity)
and Df = tan δ(loss
tangent; the lower the better).
|
|
The table shows typical values
at 1-10 GHz.
|
|
|
Material
|
Dk (εᵣ)
|
Df (×10⁻⁴)
|
Temp °C
|
Typical Use
|
|
Solid PE
|
2.3
|
2-4
|
75
|
RG58 / RG174, low-loss RF cables
|
|
Foam PE
|
1.4-1.6
|
1-3
|
85
|
CATV distribution, semi-rigid jumpers
|
|
PTFE (Teflon)
|
2.1
|
2-4
|
260
|
Semi-rigid, mmWave, aerospace
|
|
FEP
|
2.1
|
5-7
|
200
|
High-temp RF cables (RG316)
|
|
Air (helical spacer)
|
~1.1
|
<1
|
—
|
HELIAX, broadcast feeders, lowest loss
|
|
LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer)
|
2.9-3.2
|
2-4
|
270
|
5G flex circuits, USB4 flex substrates
|
|
Semi-rigid
cables use solid PTFE for minimum loss but cannot be re-bent; flexible coax
uses foam PE as a compromise.
|
|
1.5 Coaxial Connector Frequency Limits
|
|
A connector's max usable
frequency is set by the size of its internal
air-dielectric section— when the signal
wavelength approaches that opening, unwanted propagation modes (TE11) get
excited.
|
|
The industry response has been
a steady shrinking of that air gap:
|
1.6 High-Speed
Signaling Evolution: NRZ → PAM4 → 224G
|
|
The signal rate has roughly
doubled every generation for 30 years. Around 56
Gbps NRZ the channel hit a physical wall, and
the industry shifted to PAM4 (4-level pulse-amplitude modulation) — 2 bits per symbol
in exchange for half the Nyquist bandwidth.
|
|
Channel-loss budget evolution
|
|
Generation
|
Modulation
|
Nyquist loss budget
|
|
10G KR
|
NRZ
|
~ 8 dB @ 5 GHz
|
|
25G KR
|
NRZ
|
~ 10 dB @ 12.5 GHz
|
|
56G PAM4
|
PAM4
|
~ 13 dB @ 14 GHz
|
|
112G PAM4
|
PAM4
|
~ 16 dB @ 28 GHz
|
|
224G PAM4
|
PAM4
|
~ 20 dB @ 56 GHz
|
|
|
Key
interface standards
|
|
PCIe Gen5/6:
32 / 64 GT/s PAM4, intra-server
|
|
USB4 v2:
80 Gbps PAM3 + dual-lane
|
|
HDMI 2.1:
48 Gbps, fixed-cable architecture
|
|
IEEE 802.3ck:
100G / 200G / 400G Ethernet
|
|
OIF CEI-224G:
next-generation chip-to-chip
|
|
Loss
budget=ILcable+ ILconnector+ ILpcb+ ILcrosstalk≤TX
EQ headroom + RX EQ headroom
|
|
Sum of every component's loss
must fit inside the combined equalization headroom of Tx and Rx. Cross the
line and BER collapses.
|
|
1.7 Equalization: When the Channel Runs
Out
|
|
By 112G, "just buy a
better cable" no longer scales fast enough. The industry reaches for
three equalizers to claw back the high-frequency loss:
|
|
(a)CTLE: Continuous Time Linear
EQ.
|
|
A high-pass filter at the
receiver that "lifts" the high frequencies, compensating channel
roll-off. Passive, simple, low power.
|
|
(b)FFE: Feed-Forward EQ.
|
|
At the transmitter, sum
multiple delayed, weighted copies of the signal (pre-emphasis / de-emphasis)
to pre-compensate the channel.
|
|
(c)DFE: Decision Feedback EQ.
|
|
At the receiver, subtract ISI
using already-decided bits. Most powerful, but adds latency and power.
|
|
In practice a 112G SerDes
usually runs CTLE + DFEat
Rx and adds FFE at Tx. The combined goal: open the eye.
|
|
02 /
High-Current Advanced From "AWG chose" to "Life
consideration"
|
|
|
Many
people choose cable by looking up ampacity in a table. But,where did the table come from, how does your real installation
differ, and what happens at end of life?
|
|
2.1 Heat Balance: The Real Meaning Behind
Ampacity
|
|
Ampacity is not "thicker
copper = more current, period". It's a thermal
equilibrium: the Joule heat generated in the
conductor must equal the heat shed from the insulation surface to the
surroundings.
|
|
(a)Form: I² · Rac=(Tc− Ta) / (Rth,dielectric+ Rth,jacket+ Rth,ambient)
|
|
T_c = conductor operating
temperature, T_a = ambient temperature, R_th = thermal resistance of each
layer, R_ac = AC resistance (includes skin and proximity effects).
|
|
(b)Simplified form (single-core,
free air)
|
|
I=√[ (Tc− Ta) · h · π · d / Rac]
|
|
h is the surface heat-transfer
coefficient (W/m²·K), d is the conductor outer diameter. For small cables h
is roughly 5-15 W/m²·K in free air.
|
|
(c)Buried cables (IEC 60287)
|
|
Adds soil
thermal resistivity(typically 1.0-2.5
K·m/W), burial depth, and thermal coupling to neighbouring cables. IEC 60287
is a full set of iterative formulas that handle multi-core, armoured,
HDPE-jacketed constructions.
|
|
(d)The Neher-McGrath method(the empirical approach used by NEC) reduces the above
heat balance to a lookup-table-friendly approximation. It is within ±5% for
600 V cables, but for high-voltage (≥ 5 kV) or non-standard installations you
still need the full IEC 60287 treatment.
|
|
2.2
Derating Factors: Why the Table Number Always Gets Discounted
|
|
The table assumes a reference condition— usually
30°C ambient, single conductor, in free air. Real installations layer
multiple derating factors on top:
|
|
Ambient temperature (NEC Table
310.15(B)(1))
|
|
Ambient °C
|
90°C rated
|
75°C rated
|
|
30
|
1
|
1
|
|
40
|
0.91
|
0.88
|
|
50
|
0.82
|
0.75
|
|
60
|
0.71
|
0.58
|
|
70
|
0.58
|
—
|
|
Bundling
(NEC Table 310.15(C)(1))
|
|
2.3 Voltage Drop:
Different Circuits, Different Formulas
|
|
(a)DC:Vdrop=2 · I · R · L(out and back)
|
|
(b)Single-phase AC:Vdrop=2
· I · L · (R cosφ + X sinφ)(X is the
reactance, can't be ignored for large cables)
|
|
(c)Three-phase AC:Vdrop=√3
· I · L · (R cosφ + X sinφ)(most industrial
distribution)
|
|
Practical rule of thumb:low-voltage distribution (≤ 1000 V) usually requires
voltage drop≤ 3%(lighting)
or≤ 5%(power);
from the transformer to the most distant load, total drop must not
exceed 5%(NEC
210.19 / 215.2).
|
|
The cos φ effect:for a pure resistive load cos φ = 1 and the formula
collapses to 2·I·R·L. For inductive loads (motors) cos φ = 0.7-0.85, and the
reactance X matters — typically 0.07-0.1 Ω/km for cables ≥ 35 mm².
|
2.4 Short-Circuit
Withstand: Can the Insulation Hold?
|
|
During a short circuit, the
current can spike to10-30× normal for 0.1-5 seconds. In that brief window the conductor
has no time to shed heat — all the energy goes into heating up the copper and
the insulation.The insulation must survive
that temperature spike without breaking down.
|
|
Amin=Isc· √t / k
|
|
A_min = minimum allowable
cross-section (mm²), I_sc = short-circuit current (A), t = protection time
(s), k = material constant.
|
|
k examples: PVC 115, XLPE 143,
EPR 141. XLPE's higher thermal tolerance lets you use a smaller cross-section
for the same fault current.
|
|
In practice:the I²t method is most common. The breaker's
time-current curve must sit below and to the
left of the cable's I²t-withstand curve to
provide protection.
|
|
2.5 Insulation Aging:
The Cable's "Lifetime Equation"
|
|
Insulation polymers degrade
over time. The Montsinger rule("10°C rule") says: every 10°C above rated
temperature, life halves.
|
|
(a)The Arrhenius equation is
used:
|
|
L(t)=L₀ · exp[ (Ea/ k) · (1/T − 1/T₀) ]
|
|
E_a = activation energy (PVC
~80 kJ/mol, XLPE ~110 kJ/mol), T is absolute temperature (K).
|
|
At the same operating
temperature, XLPE lasts roughly 5-10× longer than PVC.
|
|
(b)Common aging phenomena
|
|
(b-1)Thermal aging
|
|
Long-term heat breaks polymer
chains. PVC at 60°C ≈ 30 years; at 80°C ≈ 7-8 years.
|
|
(b-2)Water treeing
|
|
XLPE underground cables under
water + electric field grow tree-like micro-channels inside the insulation;
breakdown after 20-30 years.
|
|
(b-3)Electrical treeing
|
|
MV/HV cables develop
branch-like damage at partial-discharge sites. Detectable early with a PD
detector.
|
|
|
2.6 Specialized
Applications: HVDC, 800V EV, Submarine
|
|
(a)HVDC
|
|
Up to ±525 kV at 2000 MW
class. XLPE is
replacing traditional oil-impregnated paper insulation for lower loss and
zero maintenance. China's Baihetan–Jiangsu link is built on domestic 535 kV
XLPE DC cable.
|
|
(b)800V EV architecture
|
|
Versus 400 V systems, 800
V halves the current for the same power— smaller cables, lower loss. The challenge is the high-frequency switching(PWM
edges with dV/dt > 5 kV/µs) creating EMI and insulation stress, so Silicone or ETFE are preferred.
|
|
(c)Submarine power cable
|
|
Up to 8 distinct layers:
copper conductor, conductor shield, XLPE insulation, insulation shield, water
barrier, metallic sheath, steel-wire armour, outer serving. Designed
for 30+ year service
under 1000m of water.
|
2.7 The Three Major
Standards Families
|
|
The most-cited safety and
design standards worldwide. One cable often has to pass several safety in
parallel (auto-spec + UL + IEC).
|
Domain
|
USA (NEC / UL)
|
International (IEC)
|
China (GB)
|
Automotive (ISO / QC/T)
|
|
Ampacity
|
NEC Table 310.16
|
IEC 60364-5-52
|
GB 50054
|
ISO 6722 (road vehicles)
|
|
NFPA 70
|
IEC 60287
|
GB/T 16886
|
|
Construction / test
|
UL 44, 758, 4703
|
IEC 60228, 60502
|
GB/T 5023, 12706
|
ISO 14572
|
|
QC/T 1037
|
|
EV charging
|
UL 2263, 2594
|
IEC 61851, 62196
|
GB/T 33594, 20234
|
—
|
|
IEC 62893
|
|
PV
|
UL 4703, 6703
|
IEC 62930
|
GB/T 39548, 39549
|
—
|
|
Energy storage
|
UL 1973, 9540
|
IEC 62619
|
GB/T 36276
|
—
|
|
Rail
|
—
|
EN 50264, 50306
|
TB/T 1484, 3159
|
—
|
|
Selection
workflow: first decide which country's / industry's safety regime you must
pass, then walk through that regime's test list, then pick the brand and
construction.
|
|
|
|
|